Showing posts with label Lone Ranger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lone Ranger. Show all posts
Saturday, March 2, 2024
Wednesday, March 2, 2022
Lone Ranger and Tonto reintroduce the Midnight Theater
While rereading old posts I ran across one from 2013 about a parody porn movie being made about the Lone Ranger (called, appropriately, Lone Ranger XXX). Just like the low-budget “mock busters” designed to have the look and feel of highly anticipated blockbusters, the porn industry has been putting out parodies of popular films, often sticking much closer to the source material than the powers that be at Disney and Warner Brothers do with the expanding comic book movie franchises.
I poked around a bit and found that Lone Ranger XXX has indeed been made and released; I also learned that a site called Adult DVD Empire, a sort of Amazon Prime of porn, not only has all of their movies organized by genre, but also has screenshots of most of them. Yes, there’s a western genre label. Yes, I have a lot of screenshots. Yes, there is going to be a Midnight Theater version of Lascivious Screenshots coming to a blog near you.
Monday, November 18, 2013
Ande Parks Explains Why the Lone Ranger Comic Fails

NANCY COLLINS: What do you think
today’s comic fan is looking for from a character like the Lone Ranger?
ANDE PARKS: They want to see the man’s
values on display. They want to see that pillar of justice. They want the
interplay between Lone Ranger and Tonto. They want action, but not without some
meaning. I think, in the case of our book, they also want a sense for what the
real Old West was like. I hope so, anyway… because we really try to get some of
that history into the book. I think it adds another layer. It makes the heroic
stories more believable, which elevates the heroism.
Doesn’t that make you want to read
Lone Ranger? Alas, Ande Parks’ Lone
Ranger run fails to do any of that for me, which is why I quit reading it in
the teens. I often wonder why Dynamite
gave Parks’ a shot at writing Lone Ranger, especially considering the following
Q&A:
NANCY COLLINS: How familiar were you
with the Lone Ranger before coming on as writer for the series?
ANDE PARKS: To be honest, not very. I
had seen the show some as a kid, but I definitely not what you would have
called a big fan. The first time I wrote the characters was in the Death of
Zorro mini-series, and I struggled to find their voices in that first issue.
Still struggling, dude. I applaud your efforts, though.
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Ain't Your Papa's Lone Ranger (but I liked it)
Now keep in mind that I liked it in
the way that I liked the Christopher Nolan Dark Knight movies. For those
I put aside three decades of knowledge of Batman and instead chose to see the
series as movies about a troubled man named Bruce Wayne who, while baring a
resemblance to Batman, is someone else entirely. Real Dark Knight fans
know that Bruce Wayne doesn’t really exist; he’s just the public face that
Batman uses occasionally.
With that in mind I didn’t look for
the Lone Ranger I know and love: the nameless, faceless knight of the sagebrush moving between masks and disguises, having long ago left the name John Ried
behind. Nah, you can tell right away that’s not where the film is going,
so why not let it stand on its own?

The Lone Ranger does a fine job, right
up to the big crazy action sequence that takes up ¼ of the movie and probably ½
the budget. I wish film makers would save the budget and just give us
more story. When you think about it, what’s the best end of film action
sequence in a western? The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, which is really
just three guys staring at each other to cool music for five minutes.
Epic.
Saturday, July 27, 2013
Midnight Theater- Lone Ranger XXX
Monday, July 15, 2013
Lone Ranger and Tonto Out of the Closet

It’s been six months since I’ve
written in this blog. What got me
back? It turns out that the Lone Ranger
and Tonto may be gay after all.
It’s an old joke that the Lone Ranger
and Tonto were partners by the campfire as well as partners in the saddle. Two men, alone in the wilderness, forsaking civilization
(particularly women) and trusting entirely in each other? It’s downright romantic.
The argument against has always been
that the 1930’s and 1940’s were simpler times and people didn’t write that kind
of thing back then (people who think the early 20th century was a purer,
simpler time may not have heard of things like the Jazz Age or the World Wars). But what if two clearly gay characters show
up in a story? Can we really dismiss the
subtext then?
The 4/13/38 radio episode Reward
Money, starts by describing two long time pards:
Jake
Caldwell and Lem Purdie had fought hard and work hard through all their years
together. They had seen stampedes, and
dusty drives over long trails. They had
known good times and bad. They quarreled,
and each on more than one occasion had saved the others' life.
They
had never been parted, and as they grew old they lived in a small, two room
shack, some distance from town, their lifetime savings hidden in their home. It
is night as our story opens. Jake,
disturbed by a noise, excited awakens his partner.
(The YouTube link below goes to the same episode, quote above starting around 2:35)
There’s not much subtext here. Their home, their savings,
never been parted, growing old together.
Sounds like a marriage to me. If
we have two male side characters who are in effect married in a story, then maybe
all of that burning subtext about the Lone Ranger and Tonto isn’t really
subtext after all.
I don’t think it changes a thing about
the old stories. The friendship, trust,
and companionship between the Lone Ranger and Tonto are evident in every
episode and comic. The exact physical
expression doesn’t matter. It’s not sex
that binds two people together; it’s love.
And no, I haven’t seen the movie
yet. It looks like a train wreck.
Monday, December 24, 2012
Tantric Lone Ranger Rides Again!
As you may be able to tell by the
sharp drop in frequency of my blog posts, this is the year that I almost gave
up on westerns. The Lone Ranger and yoga
may be what redeems them, but more on that later.
There were just so many
disappointments in westerns this year.
On the comic book front, All-Star Western continues to suck the
life out of the genre. I picked up the
latest issue this week and flipped through.
Dr. Jekyll made an appearance, then there was some kind of fight in a
slum, and then a Chinese lady is stockings started kung fu fighting. It is an embarrassment to call this a
western. The backup stories are still
great (ironically written by the same very competent team) but I don’t want to
spend $4 for a backup story.
Then Peter Brandvold, who I have
written so much about in the last year, seems to have lost whatever touch made
his Lou Prophet books work for so long.
I’ve tried half a dozen of his more recent novels looking for a return
to that wit that made his books great and been disappointed each time
(including the one where he said he’d eat the manuscript if I didn’t like it). His new Rusty Spurr book, which has so much
potential, has flat characters that are indistinguishable from one
another. The only time in the last few
years that I’ve really enjoyed his books are when he writes weird westerns (Ghost Colts, Bad Wind Blowing); I found Dust of the Damned under my
Christmas tree, maybe he’ll be back to form there.
![]() |
What really killed my desire to write
this blog is a tragedy from earlier this year that I still want to write
about. In brief, I have been playing
Dungeons & Dragons weekly with the same group of friends for seven
years. Six months ago I worked out a plan
with the friend running our game to introduce a gunslinging cowboy into the otherwise pure fantasy game. It was so
much fun that I planned out a five part series of posts to write about it. That friend died soon after in a tragic
accident, leaving behind a wife and two kids.
I can’t come back to the blog without thinking about it.
Oh, and after a sudden onset of gout I’ve
become a teetotatling vegetarian. Takes a
lot of the fun out of reading about whiskey swilling fellers eating buffalo
when you are sucking down tap water with your tofu.
With all of this disappointment I also
almost gave up yoga, something that helped me get over the host of mental,
emotional, and physical problems that follow massive invasive surgery. Something in the practice just wasn’t coming
together and I couldn’t figure out why.
I decided before I gave up all together I would go try Bikram, the
program that was described to me when I walked in the door as “Simon Says for 90
minutes in a 105 degree room”. I went in
and found a practice that didn’t look a thing like yoga, and though I walked
out disappointed I felt somehow good and kept going back. After my second class I left the building,
drove to the local supermarket, and put together a pack of food, water, and hot
coffee for the homeless guy at the end of the road. After my third class I returned to my
original yoga home and signed up to learn to be a yoga instructor.
This is because of westerns, or more
specifically because of the Lone Ranger.
I’ve written about the connections between yoga and the Lone Ranger
before, and as I move through life they are becoming more palpable. The notion that one can serve the betterment
of humanity, seek to protect life, and do it without the notion of reward
(hence the mask) is really entrancing. Also,
he has two Colts and a cool cowboy hat. It
helps that, like the Lone Ranger, I have my own silver mine to support me (in
the guise of a great job with a Fortune 100 company). So the Lone Ranger is my guru, a comic book
battle cry is my meditative mantra, and I dream of wearing a mask as I move
through the postures of my yoga practice.
Having said that, this movie looks
terrible.
Labels:
comics,
gaming,
Jonah Hex,
Lone Ranger,
personal notes,
Peter Brandvold,
weird west,
yoga
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)